Gadget Audit
Home / Scoring rubric
Review standards

Scores name the evidence behind them

Version 1.1 deliberately separates hands-on lab-test scores from research-based editorial scores. This is a transparency policy revision, not a silent rewrite.

Version 1.1Effective September 22, 2026
CategoryWhat it coversEligibility
DesignDocumented build, ergonomics, controls, repair access and practical carrying or placement constraints.Editorial evidence
FeaturesHow clearly documented functions address the intended use case and ecosystem.Editorial evidence
ValueThe editorial verdict weighed against a dated, verified price—not a permanent MSRP fiction.Editorial evidence
BatteryCited runtime, charge or capacity evidence, with manufacturer claims clearly labeled.Cited evidence; when applicable

Two score types

Hands-on lab-test score: used only after our editorial team physically tests and measures the product under a documented setup.

Research-based editorial score: editorial judgment from published review consensus, specification analysis and third-party hands-on reports — not a lab-test result. It follows the article’s relative roundup ranking plus its cited pros, cons, verdict and comparisons.

A lower-ranked product cannot outscore a higher-ranked product in the same article. We use whole- or half-star steps, never invented decimal sub-scores. Without an honest differentiating basis, the result is Not scored. Read the full policy →

How the industry reads star bands

We use a five-star scale with half-star steps. The bands communicate recommendation strength, while the accompanying text explains evidence, trade-offs, the intended buyer and whether the score is hands-on or research-based.

Weighted face-off template

Every face-off publishes its weights before its verdict. The template reference is Tom’s Guide’s published head-to-head weighting — Price/value 5, Design 15, Controls 10, Sound quality 25, ANC 20, Call quality 10, Connectivity 5, Battery life 10 — a 100-point table (worked example: 84 vs 85). We adapt the weights to the buying decision; the rule stays the same: weights first, winner second.